Statcounter


« The Economics of Enough | Main | A magna carta for money?: reflections on a week of talking about 'the long now' »

October 20, 2010

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Thomas Barker

True, but the biggest reason those restrictive rules exist is pension mis-selling in 80s.

There's a strange economics to misleading advice. The small firms I've worked for live in terror of even being accused of being misleading, but are reasonably relaxed about chatting to customers. Common-sense survives as the overhead of setting complex rules is too high.

A big corporate might have millions of procedures about what they can/can't say to customers, but ultimately they can make $Y out of a bad recommendation and budget 7% of that for the fines/compensation. To a large organisation, the cost of self-insuring deceptive behaviour (like PPI sales) is cheap.

I think consumers have always been on their own. Maybe the FSA should just spend it all on billboards saying "Sales people are evil and should not be trusted." :-)

The comments to this entry are closed.